Saturday, October 27, 2007

Handy Tools




Here are two very handy tools for mobile installs:

The Thexton 436 - Wire Insertion Tool. You use this to poke and feed DC zip cord through the grommets in the firewall. (If you are using a cig plug connection to power your radio, you can quit reading this blog.)

The Antenex HS-34 3/4" NMO hole saw ... again mag mount users can read another blog :-)

The last item is a Husky Tools 693-232... which is basically a flat blade screw driver with a V. You use this to safely remove those pesky plastic snap in buttons that hold your headliner and other interior plastic vehicle trim together.

The final piece I'm going to share if for hand-held radio repair. It's a special spanner nut drive for removal/tightening of those spanner style nuts over the volume and channel selection knobs as well as the nut over the SMA antenna connector.

If you have a Yeasu VX-5, you likely have had to tighten that antenna nut.

The best thing I've found is the "X-key for Handheld Repair 13mm, 11mm, 9, and 8.5 mm" A guy out of hong kong sells this for $5 on ebay.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

Encryption and ham radio?

This is an area almost guaranteed to ruffle a few feathers. And that political stuff isn't the point of my blog. However it does apply directly to my "develop the data aspects of the hobby"... furthermore there seem to be a lot of misconceptions.

First off, the word "encryption" is not in Part 97 at all. What hams are thinking of is Section 97.1 13(a)(4) of the FCC rules, which prohibits "messages in codes or ciphers intended to obscure the meaning thereof, except as otherwise provided herein.. ."

The ARRL feels that encryption is ok as long as the purpose is NOT TO HIDE the message content is within Part 97. While the basic point is that our ham bands are not meant to be secure against casual listening. However, when we are providing communications for some agency or organization, such as for disaster relief, those agencies have some expectation of confidentiality. Information about people, as well as movement of supplies and resources, is not meant to be heard by the general public.

As one should see in this case, the encryption's purpose is not to "obscure" but to provide security for sensitive / confidential information from the general public, not even necessarily from other amateurs. A good long standing precedent example is where encryption has been used on amateur satellite control uplinks for many years.

In a data applications, this easily can apply to passwords and access control. Passwords or small snippets of data surely don't hide the message as they are not necessarily even the message itself.

To further this, an amendment made to Article 25.2A (1A) at the 2003 World radio Conference no longer specifically prohibits the use of encryption and other strong security measures on transmissions between Amateur Radio stations within the same jurisdiction. 

To summarize, the the purpose is what matters, or your intent. The rule is not regulating a method or practice; it regulates a purpose or intent.

If we are encrypting for network security and access control, emergency communications, and/or practice for the same—our purposes in using encryption are the security of the network and the privacy of third-party information. In either case, the purpose is not to obscure meaning.

Whatever encryption methods you use WEP, WPA, WPA2, or whatever—it must be publicly documented. (This is to conform with 97.309's authorized data emission code requirement.) Please note that this specifically means the encryption algorithm, not the encryption key.

Frank Rietta, KI4AWF writes a good piece titled; Authentication Without Encryption for Ham Radio.

The type of authentication process he illustrates has been used for a couple decades on packet radio nodes for remote access to the sysop / administration modes.

I feel few will have any qualms about this use of authentication in ham radio.

So ask yourself if this is okay, what about authenticating entire messages?

Again it has has to do with intent. Further exemplified by:

From the ARRL Message Handing Form:
ARRL FSD-3 contains Relief Emergency Recommended Procedures which allow for the use of “numbered” Radiograms. FCC rules and regulations allow for these ARRL numbered shortcuts as they are not intended to obscure the contents of the message, but rather to further reduce the possibility of ambiguity or error. These “numbers” refer to the following shortcuts in Group One for Possible Relief Emergency traffic – not to the “message number” box on the Radiogram.




For further reading see;
"Data Encryption is Legal," by N2IRZ, CQ Magazine Aug 2006 Or his other version printed in TAPR's PSR, Summer 2006, titled "Some Encryption is Legal"
"HSMM and Information Security," by K8OCL CQ-VHF Fall 2004

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Linux Repeater Contoller


Some of the early software repeater controllers were far from ideal. But that was many moons ago, back in the days of DOS. Since then, stable operating systems link Linux have come along. So have embedded computers such as mini-ITX mother boards. The physical hard drives that were prone to failure can also be replaced with flash media.

I see two viable ways to go if you need a controller and want to save a bundle.
-The IRLP Repeater Controller Project
-Asterisk with the app_rpt project.

Asterisk with app_rpt provides the following for Amateur Radio stations and systems: A Full Function Repeater Controller, Touch Tone Command and Control, Autopatch - Reverse and VOX Operation, CTCSS Decode/Encode Functions, A SIP Telephone Exchange, Voice Mail and Announcements, Contact Closure Telemetry, Non-Proprietary Software and Hardware, PC/Linux Operating System Based, Remote Base Client, Fully Configurable and Programmable Communications Solution

http://ohnosec.org/drupal/

The IRLP controller program is a simple controller that provides hangtime, DTMF muting, activity controller ID, and controllable courtesy tones. Intelligent CW repeater ID. You can adjust; The hangtime in milliseconds, the shortkey timer in milliseconds (COS time required for hangtime activation), the alligator timer in seconds (COS timeout), toggle DTMF mute on/off, the DTMF mute duration in milliseconds, the ID interval in seconds (time between IDs), the courtesy tone frequency.

http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/voip/irlp-repeater.html

Friday, August 17, 2007

"Radio Hams" Film (Pete Smith Specialty)




This film is from 1939. I starts off giving some clues as to what ham radio was.

In amateur field, radio parts often include pieces of assorted junk, ingeniously assembled by opperators who are called "hams"...

Thursday, August 16, 2007

What is ham radio?

1912 marked the beginning of the amateur radio service. It should be noted that there were many radio experimenters or radio amateurs before this time that lead to the discovery of radio. Even after 1912 many important discoveries where made in radio by radio amateurs.

The FCC's section 97.1 defined the basis and purpose of ham radio:

(a) Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications.

(b) Continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to the advancement of the radio art.

(c) Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which provide for advancing skills in both the communications and technical phases of the art.

(d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts.

(e) Continuation and extension of the amateur's unique ability to enhance international goodwill.

As you can see the emergency communications part that usually is the first thing to stand out in our minds is actually only a small part of what we are supposed to be. We exist and have access to a very valuable resource (the radio spectrum) because of or contributions, discoveries and experimentation.

Now lets look at that radio spectrum that we are so graciously given...

Amateur Allocations - Little known fact - Did you know in the US amateurs have access to approximately:
3.75 MHz of HF (160m-10m) spectrum
67 MHz of VHF/UHF (6m-33cm) spectrum
24.095 GHz of microwave (23cm-300GHz) spectrum

I hope you can see where our largest frequency allocations are. These are also unfortunately ham radios least actively used allocations. Yet, these higher frequency allocations are typically the ones most actively targeted by companies putting pressure on the FCC. There is little commercial interest in HF frequencies. Companies want to allow unlicensed operations over a wider frequency range (some moneymaking operations like PCS cell phones are actually Part 15 unlicensed transmitters). There is much more amateur spectrum to lose if we don’t use it more actively.

By the way; these truths are the point of my blog.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Amateur Paging



Back in the late 80s through the 90's, two-tone paging was pretty popular. Many repeater controllers were setup to send these. Hams caring around the popular Minitor pagers on their belts could be summoned via a touch-tone invoked setup on the repeater. You don't see much of that anymore for whatever reason. The only people you noticed still being voice paged are usually volunteer fire / EMS guys.

The idea of digital paging always interested me, but it never seem to have gotten much attention in the ham radio world. Perhaps now that digital voice formats are emerging it's time to touch briefly on the idea again.

Back in the 90's Clive Cooper, G8UNK wrote a software POCSAG digital paging encoder. Kantronic's also came out with the KPC-9612 TNC cable of encoding POCSAG. (If you are wondering what POCSAG is, it's a well known standard for radiopaging)

Paging is kind of a one way deal, much like those beaconing the APRS locations. If this sounds interesting, here is a link for more information:

http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/pager/plan.html

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Some Linux Software





This hobby was founded by people tinkering, if you stop and think about it.

So in that same spirit, I'm going to share/promote a few related open source software packages that I have recently stumbled into.

http://www.geda.seul.org/
gEDA is a project towards a full suite of Electronic Design Automation tools. Tools for electrical circuit design, schematic capture, simulation, prototyping, and production. It also features; analog and digital simulation, and printed circuit board (PCB) layout.

http://linpsk.sourceforge.net/
For you HF PSK enthusiasts, LinPSK supports BPSK, QPSK and RTTY.

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~mmic/puffindex/Linux/pufflinux.html
PUFF is the name of a computer aided design program for microwave circuits, developed at the California Institute of Technology. It allows one to easily edit a circuit and calculate and plot the circuit's scattering parameters.

http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/splat.html
And here is a personal favorite. SPLAT is an RF Signal Propagation, Loss, And Terrain analysis tool for the spectrum between 20 MHz and 20 GHz.

SPLAT provides site engineering data such as the great circle distances and bearings between sites, antenna elevation angles (uptilt), depression angles (downtilt), antenna height above mean sea level, antenna height above average terrain, bearings and distances to known obstructions, path loss and field strength based on the Longley-Rice Irregular Terrain Model, and minimum antenna height requirements needed to establish line-of-sight communication paths and Fresnel Zone clearances absent of obstructions due to terrain.

As a side note: All of the online interactive Wireless / RF design potting utilities on the GBPPR website are based around a slightly modified version of this program. So you if care to see splat in action without installing it you can check those utilities out.

http://opencircuitdesign.com/xcircuit/

http://xoscope.sourceforge.net/

And a really good collection of Linux Hamradio Applications called Hamsoft

http://www.baudline.com/

http://hamshack-hack.sourceforge.net/- The Hamshack Hack is a "Live CD". As a "Live CD" system, no installation to your machines hard drive is necessary. The whole package will run off the CD by building a "ram disk" in your machine's memory. As soon as you re-boot your machine, the LINUX system vaporizes and you'll be back with whatever system is installed on your hard drive.

Monday, May 28, 2007

Repeater Activity Graphs


In this piece of documentation, I show how to generate on the fly line graph image files of repeater activity.

http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/voip/activity-graphs.html

In this case we assume the repeater has an IRLP computer running the Linux operating system already interfaced to it. The IRLP hardware interface an system binaries already provide us the necessary basic tools. We don't need a basic stamp or PIC interface.

IRLP has a readinput binary for troubleshooting. This reports; cos active, cos inactive, ptt active, ptt inactive, and all dtmf decoded. Since this is always connected to your repeater system you can use it as a data basis to generate a visual graph of system activity using gnuplot, a command line utility. This is handy to identify when the system is most active. You can have the graph export to a club website or just about anything you can think of. I have the file output use the day of week name in it, so you can easily look at weeks worth of data.

Monday, May 14, 2007

Spread Spectrum



Spread spectrum is a radio technique that continuously alters its transmission pattern either by constantly changing carrier frequencies or by constantly changing the data pattern.

If you asking why, then let me point out that in order to support a high speed or multi-media transmissions you will need a bit of bandwidth. The 2 meter band is only 4 MHz wide, and already well populated. Spread spectrum can share the same frequency band (overlay) with other uses.

Spread Spectrum was invented in 1940. Austrian-born Hedy Lamarr, considered one of the sexiest actresses of her time, was also a co-inventor of frequency hopping.

There are two basic types; Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) and Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS).

DSSS is the basis for CDMA cellphones and 802.11 wireless transmission. FHSS is used for bluetooth devices.

It wasn't till 1981 that the FCC authorized spread spectrum on amateur frequencies. In late 1999 the FCC relaxed Amateur Spread Spectrum rules. (Prior only certain spreading codes where allowed)

Presently Part 97.311 of the rules effectively limits amateur spread spectrum to 1 watt. Please support the passage of RM-11325, to have that 1 watt limit lifted. Spread spectrum this day in age, should not be treated as an inferior mode.

It may seem like a moot point to some. For you see 802.11b is direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS), but it has largely be replaced by 802.11g and 802.11a, both of which use Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation instead of DSSS. OFDM is technically not spread spectrum and thusly is not encumbered by the 1 watt rule.

Frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) is in my mind the best fit for the present ham band plans. In FHSS the carriers are narrow and "hop" around only staying on a given frequency for less than a second. It's also hops around interference.

DSSS on the other hand is spread over a wide fixed spread of frequencies, usually occupying several megahertz. 900 MHz and above the bands are pretty un occupied so fitting DSSS in isn't really and issue. But as you should see FHSS stands the best chance of working in amateur radio on band 70 centimeters and below, on bands where there is already occupancy.

Data networking aside, there are now some new FHSS voice radios out there for 900 MHz. They are both obviously digital voice and capable of text messaging.

Motorola DTR650
Apparently Motorola has repackaged their off network iDen 900 MHz ISM FHSS walkie talkie feature into a simplex radio. Range is actually 1/2 way decent on them from what I've seen, couple miles line of sight. It has a removable antenna. The price is around $300



TriSquare eXRS Radios
906 to 923.75 MHz, 50 hopping channels, 1 watt power, -124 dBm receive sensitivity, 397 ms. dwell time, 11.5 KHz occupied bandwidth. Integrated antenna, but can be modified with an SMA connector. Nothing to compare with the Motorola DTR radios. Nowhere near the price either. These can be picked up at higher end sporting good stores usually for under $100 a pair.

Brian NB9E writes about the Trisquare radios:

While doing some mountain top maintenance on some of our ham repeaters here in northeastern NV (Elko area) I made contact with my wife (kc1ndy) around 30 miles from Swails Mt in Carlin to Pleasant Valley(near Lamoille). One radio was modified with an SMA connector and an SMA-3 Comet rubber duck which is rated for 2m,440 and 915!!! Impressive range to say the least for 1 watt!!! As far as legalities go the unit operates in the ham band limits and can be re-certified under Part 97 rules. The unit boasts over 1 billion channels actually hopping sequences. It really only hops 50 channels between 906 and 923 about 396 Ms each if I remember correctly. A better choice though might be the Moto DTR-650 which has a removable antenna!!! I've yet to get my hands on a pair of these yet, but they're on my list!!!


For more information see the March 2008 Popular Communications Magazine Tech Showcase article on the TSX300 by Bernard Bates

The TriSquare units use use analog FM instead of digital modulation for the voice, while the Motorola DTR's use digital modulation. There have been reports that an Optoelectronics R-10 can lock right onto the TriSquare FHSS signal and hearthe audio with no problems whatsoever.

Thursday, April 26, 2007

NTS ?



Since everything seems to be IP based, telephone, internet, and now TV, and all it takes is one backhoe to spoil your day. If you look and even and modest sized government building or business for that matter, the sheer amount of communications or "traffic" is just mind boggling. Granted when push comes to shove, some of those communications are aren't important as others some are more leisurely. But either way, there is a ton.

When something goes wrong, a emergency director of sorts has to prioritize what needs to get through. Then that someone directing has to almost word by word take those messages to a ham who setup for this emergency and that ham then "handles" that "traffic" in almost a word by word translation to the other end where that ham takes those dictations to who ever is directing that end.

Doesn't this sound like a bit of a bottle neck? Two hams, one on each end being handed / and handing 3x5 cards of messages. Good-god is this the 1940's? Well on the positive at least side hopefully the really critical messages got passed to the respective ends which does beat the alternative of no communications due to the normal circuits being down. And in the end it's a ham radio horary because we look good and helped in a time of crisis?

I'd like to think there are certainly better ways do handle this 90 % of the time. This antiquated national traffic system (NTS) is a very good fundamental concept to maybe resort to as a last resort or when you need to handle traffic long distances to different countries. For county/localized based emergencies I think hams should be learning more about setting up emergency ad-hoc wireless networks. After all TCP/IP seems to be the building block of modern communication. If hams can come in and set up a temporary wireless data link of a decent throughput, in theory all of the normal "traffic" of the building can be routed over this wireless link in the temporary absence of fiber/telco lines/cable etc that the slightly inebriated backhoe operator may have severed.

http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/nts-mpg/

From the Level 1 ARES training manual:
"Do not think about how to use ham radio to send the message - just think about the best and fastest way to send it".


Here are some good thoughts from Wayne Green, W2NSD from April 1987:
OUR 50-YEAR-OLD TRAFFIC SYSTEM

A message sent via the ARRL National Traffic System arrived this morning. It had to do with a coming visit from a Kansas ham. Well, that was nice-except the message was delivered three days short of a month after it was sent and the chap had visited a couple weeks ago.

How about it, you fanatic ARRL members, is constructive criticism uncalled far-out of line blasphemy? Am I a candidate for the lunatic fringe I'll even suggest that we're close to the 90s-and not the 1890s-that perhaps it's gelling lime to gel the delivery time down to two weeks on messages?

One would think that our advances in technology should somehow be usable to get traffic through within seconds anywhere in the country-minutes around the world.

I'm sure there is still a need for a message handling system that takes a month to deliver the messages. Let's see now, what would we use that for? What a wonderful system to have in place for use in times of emergency. right? And that's supposed to be one of the reasons for the National Traffic System, I believe. Yes, I'm being sarcastic.

When I got involved with RTTY back in 1948. I was impressed by the speed and accuracy of digital communications . We had to build our own converters at first , but as commercial equipment came on the market I expected the traffic handlers to go for it. In 1950 we had a RTTY repeater and network set up so any RTTY op in the Greater New York area could leave a message at an unattended station-complete with an acknowledgement of receipt. It seemed like an ideal system for emergencies and traffic handling.

So here we are, almost 40 years later, and we're still banging out messages with hand keys and taking near a month to get 'em halfway across the country- from Kansas to New Hampshire. Wow! Is it any wonder we have a shortage of youngsters interested in "enjoying" our hobby? Oh, we've made a little progress. Vfo's replaced crystals in the 405. Side from band replaced AM in the 60s. Repeaters replaced simplex in the 70s. Nothing has yet replaced the dull QSO, the traffic handling, or the DX pileups of the 305.

One thing modern business has recently relearned from the past - the customer is right . If you've read the business success and the excellence books, you know the most successful businesses are those that provide the products and services their customers want. They keep asking what's wanted-and provide it. Amateur radio has been particularly resistant to this philosophy, with the same results we've seen in business- imminent bankruptcy.

Even the most insular of amateurs is aware by now that all is not well with amateur radio. I'm not the only one pointing to our lack of growth-our geriatric membership--- our lack of technical progress in the last twenty years. Indeed, you don' t hear anything else these days-even from the ARRL.

Perhaps it's time to look at amateur radio as if it were a business- a nonprofit business, but still a business. Thus, if we're going to keep our business going we're going to need new customers to replace those who lose interest or die-or both. If we're not holding the interest of customers- and not attracting new customers in adequate numbers to stay in business, it's time to ask the customers and potential customers what they want that we're not providing.

One has to be deaf not to hear the chorus asking us, "Why Morse code?" Yes, there sure are a lot of deaf hams-at least as far as this emotional subject is concerned. They don't want to even hear about it- and there's no way you can get them to actually think about it.

The closest thing we have in amateur radio to a corporate organization is our only national society, the ARRL. This puts the onus on the League to provide us with guidance and leadership. The League got to be the one and only by killing off every upstart group that threatened their power. With that power is responsibility-and one of the major responsibilities of any corporation is to make sure the firm survives.

Corporate executives who turn a blind eye and ear to the firm's prospective customers would normally be ousted by the board of directors. In turn, directors who ignore the needs of customers, even over the advice of their executives, would quickly be replaced by the shareholders.

In the amateur radio hobby, the corporation is the ARRL, the executives are the HQ gang, and the directors are those you elect every two years in your division. You, as an ARRL member, are the shareholders.

I've talked with most of the HQ gang and I thin k they're by far the best bunch I've seen at HQ in 50 years. I wish I could say the same about the directors. Alas! Darn, there I go again, attacking the League. Or am I? From my viewpoint I see a serious problem and I have what looks to me like a simple proposed solution-one with which I think you'll agree, if you're able to think about it.

Let's go back to the analogy of our hobby and a business. If we want to keep it going, we have to provide services which in some way pay for our license to use public property: our frequencies. We've let our customer base grow old and feeble and have resisted attracting new customers. Am I being unfair to suggest there's an element of responsibility for the League to solve this problem?

The League is an $8 million a year business these days. That's about the same order of magnitude as my Digital Audio magazine, so I have a fair grasp of what it takes to run that size business. Businesses of any size have boards of directors (like the league). Since I'm on the board of severer corporations, including one projected to reach $1 billion in sales in a couple more years. I'm quite familiar with the responsibilities of directors.

Boards of directors are normally made up of experienced and successful business executives. They're experts in marketing, technology, financial management, and so on. And here's where I see the basic weakness of the league-a weakness that has kept the ARRL from providing our hobby (its business) with the leadership to keep it strong and healthy.

When you get your ballots to vote for your next director, what do you see on each one? You know what you see-a list of the ARRL appointments he's held. In many cases he's come up through the traffic system, so we know he's probably a true believer in Morse code for everyone. How many bios have you seen citing business experience-business success-including marketing, sales, financial, and ether experience which is fundamentally a part of a director's responsibility? We seem all too often to elect teachers, who haven't a clue as to how to run an $8 million business.

A business-savvy ARRL board would, I'm convinced, have started working years ago on getting school radio clubs going so we'd have the infrastructure to bring the league new customers. And they'd have kept current with Customer needs through surveys making the needed changes to keep the hobby growing-even including a no-code license.
The boards of corporations that ignore the customers find their corporations under attack by raiders. Indeed, with virtually no exceptions, recent corporate raids have been brought on by boards of directors that have let their corporations weaken to the point where the directors should be replaced.

In the ham field, the responsibility comes right down to you. It's the unwillingness of most hams to be involved with ham politics that has allowed so many hopelessly incompetent hams-good solid Morse men, to be sure-etc become ARRL directors-the biggest ego trip our hobby has to offer. Neither you nor your club has ever written to the candidates to find out if they have been successful in business-perhaps even with some experience as a director of other corporations.

No, despite my tone of attack, I'm really not blaming you, But I will blame you if you let this scenario continue. No, I have to say flat out that it's my fault!. I should have made this an issue long ago. Oh, yes, I did write about it a few years ago-but I didn't keep after you.

And you're like me. If someone doesn't hassle you, you forget. I did the same as you with the last ballot- I looked over the candidates-noted their years of ARRL service and myriad of appointments- sighed, shrugged, and tossed a coin.

The board elections are geared so there realty isn't time to get the business background (or lack of it) into print in 73 between the time we know who's running and the mailing of the ballots. One of these days we may get amateur radio set up so we're able to actually communicate in less than three months, but I hesitate to even guess when that'll be.

Tell me, if you were an ARRL director, would you think it important to update the National Traffic system by about 50 years?

II you agree and have some constructive ideas, I'd like to hear from you. If you disagree and can express your ideas in other than blind, emotional hate terms, please write. I've tried to get across my ideas on where we are and how to make things better now I'd like your ideas. I reserve the right to change my mind completely if something better comes along.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

HSMM with the 900 MHz Aerocomm modem



High Speed Multi Media (HSMM) is often referred to as being the Hinternet (Ham Internet), as it is primarily used under FCC Rules & Regulations Part 97. Under Part 97 commercial off-the-shelf equipment can be used at higher power and higher gain than the more common Part 15 802.11a/b/g operations.

The primary purpose for HSMM and Hinternet is to augment emergency communications via long range high speed wireless data networks that can handle voice, data and video communications. HSMM can also be used in the day-to-day aspects of Amateur Radio Communications.


The AeroComm CL4490, is a 1 watt 900 MHz, frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) serial modem that can yield 20-25 kbps of throughput. They are about $100, which is really quite reasonable considering the price of a conventional TNC and radio.

The actual RF module itself (AC4490) can be bought for $62. The complete AeroComm CL4490 transceiver includes the AC4490 module housed in a nice aluminum case with an internal switching power supply and the necessary RS-232 to TTL conversion circuit.

We have experienced solid mobile non line of site coverage for 3 miles, with mobile coverage extending to 6 miles depending on terrain. This is with a measly 6 dB base station at 35 feet. Distances over 20 miles line of site are theoretically possible with these.

For more information on the Aerocomm, and to obtain specifics on the network configuration see:
http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/aerocomm/

HSMM Information Resources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinternet
http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/wireless/plan.html

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

A Universal Programming Interface


This Russian website has a schematic to build a radio interface box (RIB) that can program, Kenwood, Motorola, Icom, Yeasu and other radios. It's capable of programming portable and mobiles and well over 500 different models.

So stop throwing your money away on all the various programmers out there, and build this one.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Advanced Receiver Preamp Modification



I have used both 2 meter and 440MHZ GaAsFET versions. If you read the comments on eham, you'll likely be confused as to whether it is a good product. I can assure you they are. The reason the older bipolar ones don't seem to have a back eye is simple, they are less sensitive.

However I've found that if you add a pair of back to back silicon diodes (1N914) to the GaAsFET preamp's input this will protect it from overloading. That's almost an essential mod on these GASFET preamps as they are very static sensitive. Even more so for a repeater site where strong field strengths (or lightening prone areas) are present. However, at repeater sites, ideally your preamp should have a preselector.

You add a pair of back to back 1N914 diodes to the preamp's input to protect it from overloading. As you can see the two I drew-in are in parallel, in back to back, opposing directions (anode to cathode). The pair is soldered onto the center feed antenna input to ground. The idea is to always clamp the input signal to always a safe level and protect the preamp's FET from overload.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

1.2 GHz HSMM with the Icom ID-1


Back in June 2004 we inquired about Icom's 1.2 GHz ID-1 D-Star solution for ham radio voice and data communications. We were fortunate enough to be able to evaluate it for a few months.

Our short documentation is located at:

http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dstar-evaluation/

You can also read the Wisconsin Amateur Packet Radio review here:
http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/wapr/0204.html

We were most interested in the data performance and networking ability of the D-STAR system. The only radio that can do any significant data transfer is the 1.2 GHz ID-1. It's listed with a (theoretical value) transmission speed of 128 kbs. We clocked an effective TCP/IP throughput of 90 Kbs. Perfectly understandable considering protocol overheads.

We didn't have a lot of time to mess with it. Our initial path was a 4 mile hop, but that was just on the fringe due to the Packers stadium in the middle. We could communicate using the digital voice mode and analog FM, but not the digital data. A few more feet of height might have done it. We were at 60 feet at the remote end, and 40 at the other.

So we opted to test the data performance on a much shorter path with another local.

The lesson learned is even at 10 watts on 1.2 GHz, verses the 1 watt or less on 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz, microwave path loss doesn't change much.

So in our case for much, much less money we can accomplish the same paths at even higher speeds using other hardware. What would be interesting is to see how well the ID-1 would work mobile. I do believe it would work quite well for this compared to the alternatives.
{edit} Reports indicate that it takes a very solid signal into the Access Point/DD system to work well. And works good over a large area when non-moving, but motion/multipath tears it up. A continuous ping by with a 1.2 GHz radio would start working at very stop light, and stop as soon as was moving.


After having looked at the various documentation, the Digital Data (DD) mode of the 1.2 GHz Icom ID-1 is a rather strange design.

There is reason for concern on that the amount of overhead is huge (D-STAR header + Ethernet header + IP header), and that the FEC as implemented is a bit strange (why does it only apply to the D-STAR header, and not the Ethernet frame?). Further the protocol has no real mention of channel access concerns (collision detection, avoidance, etc). It really looks to me like DV with ethernet frames stuffed into the payload section (i.e. maybe it was somewhat of an afterthought).

All the DD mode appears to do is forward ethernet frames around. On its own, it does not do any acknowledgment/handshaking. This is all left to the upper-layer protocols (i.e. TCP).

It appears that if a collision happens then the DD packet is just lost, and there's no really mechanism to avoid collisions at the DD layer, either. It's up to the higher-layer protocol to do anything about it.

So you really have no indicator of channel quality when using it. The lack of this sort of thing seems like a major oversight. It looks like packet radio done badly, although with better speeds. If it were introduced 15 to 20 years ago we would have hailed it as the savior of packet radio, but now it looks like a poor imitation of WiFi.

To further, it doesn't help most of what you will read on the other D-Star Yahoo groups shows that the ID-1 isn't being used with good RF engineering practice leading to poor results.

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

A more modern image?










The average age of the 659,000 licensed ham operators in the United States is in the 60s, according to the American Radio Relay League, a national association for enthusiasts, based in Newington, Conn (2007)

And with age comes a love for tradition and to re-live the past.
"Amateur Radio used to be technology leaders. Today its the last bastion of otherwise obsolete 'museum modes' like AM, CW and ATV while the real world technologies of digital wide band modes are exploding. Not that having a place for museum modes is bad -- in my opinion we just shouldn't hold on to them at the expense of the future." --Bill - WA7NWP. (Mar 18, 2007 to the digitalradio yahoo group)


Amateur Radio is supposed to be an exciting cutting-edge communications technology hobby where you are free to explore the latest communications techniques and communicate with other Amateur Radio operators, or "Hams" all over the world using any methods the operator chooses.


The Average age of the members of the ARRL board of directors

15 Directors - average age 64.3 (range 49 to 82)
15 Vice Directors - average age 56.7 (range 27 to 65)

ARRL President Joel Harrison W5ZN is 49, and the youngest ever ARRL President. The ten ARRL Officers average 60 years old.

The average ARRL member is 55-60 years old.

Ten years ago, the average licensed ham was around 50 years old. And going back even further, in 1985 the average ham was 46 years old (per 73 magazine)....

And going back even further yet... The ARRL, paid an independent survey company in 1960 to do a study of amateur radio. The report showed that 80% of all ham newcomers were teenagers, with 50% being either 14 or 15 years old. (Further, they found that 80% of these newcomers ended up pursuing high-tech careers as a result of their interest in amateur radio.)

I think a new ham radio appearance would help to make the hobby more appealing. If you ask me, it needs to be more appealing for younger folks if the hobby is expected to survive.

So to do my very small part, I have been pointing out ham radio in popular culture. Specifically in the Simpson's, and other "cartoon" shows.

See:
http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/files/ham/cartoon/cartoon.html

{Edit 2010}
CQ Magazine recently did a survey of their "fans" on Facebook and found the average age was 45.

 In the Remote Operating for Amateur Radio book published by the ARRL in 2010, the first chapter, "The case for Internet Remote Control," states "At the time of this writing, the average ham was edging into his or her sixth decade on the planet; many amateurs are older still."

{2014}
Atlantic Division
Director: Bill Edgar, N3LLR  Born: 1952
Vice Director: Tom Abernethy, W3TOM  Born: 1952

Central Division
Director: George R. Isely, W9GIG  Born: 1939
Vice Director: Kermit Carlson, W9XA  Born: 1956

Dakota Division
Director: Gregory P. Widin, K0GW  Born: 1952
Vice Director: Kent Olson, KA0LDG Born: 1963

Delta Division
Director:  David Norris, K5UZ  Born: 1961
Vice Director: Ed Hudgens, WB4RHQ  Born: 1944

Great Lakes Division
Director: Jim Weaver, K8JE  Born: 1935
Vice Director: Dale Williams, WA8EFK Born: 1940

Hudson Division
Director: Mike Lisenco, N2YBB  Born: 1953
Vice Director: William Hudzik, W2UDT Born: 1947

Midwest Division
Director: Cliff Ahrens, KØCA  Born: 1945
Vice Director: Rod Blocksome, KØDAS Born: 1945

New England Division
Director: Tom Frenaye, K1KI  Born: 1950
Vice Director: Mike Raisbeck, K1TWF  Born: 1949

Northwestern Division
Director: Jim Pace, K7CEX  Born: 1943
Vice Director: Bonnie Altus, AB7ZQ  Born: 1955

Pacific Division
Director: Bob Vallio, W6RGG  Born: 1936
Vice Director: Jim Tiemstra, K6JAT  Born: 1955

Roanoke Division
Director: Dennis Bodson, W4PWF  Born: 1967
Vice Director: Dr. James Boehner, N2ZZ  Born: 1955

Rocky Mountain Division
Director: Brian Mileshosky, N5ZGT  Born: 1980
Vice Director: Dwayne Allen, WY7FD  Born: 1962

Southeastern Division
Director: Doug Rehman, K4AC  Born: 1963
Vice Director: Michael Lee, AA6ML  Born: 1956

Southwestern Division
Director: Richard J. Norton, N6AA  Born: 1941
Vice Director: Marty Woll, N6VI  Born: 1950

West Gulf Division
Director: Dr David Woolweaver, K5RAV  Born: 1942
Vice Director: John Robert Stratton N5AUS Born: 1947