Emergency communications has been part of ham radio from it’s inception. Yet we need separate entities (ARES/RACES) to help promote it? Why not separate entities to help advance this hobby?
“Do we need to keep maintaining an inefficient, overly-political, antiquated, bureaucratic emcomm-specific radio organization? No. Amateur radio operators have always been willing to help in times of true emergency, and that won’t change if ARRL didn’t have its grubby little hands all over it. ARES-type emcomm as we know it could use some restructuring and attitude changes. When all else truly does fail, agencies will still want us, whether we’re trained in ICS or not, and whether we’re ARES or not.” --- Kevin K0KDS
What you're seeing in an influx of people who have no interest in technology or experimenting.
CB is back. Remember the 1970s?
We have a generation of "communicators", people who pick up a cell phone or microphone and want to communicate (talk).
The underlying technology is of no interest to this generation.
Citing the need to grow the hobby, the entry criteria have been overly simplified. We now give a ham license in every Happy Meal sold.
The end result is the need for ARRL to create reason for people to become hams, Public Service.
Ham radio is nothing like it used to be, and will never again be a platform for experimenting and technology seekers. ---- [Callsign removed by request]
In the January 2010 issue of QST on page 9 the “It seems to Us” editorial by K1ZZ is about just this same theme.
It’s titled “Not an Emergency Radio Service?” And references a FCC Public Notice DA 09-2259 that states “While the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communications service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications, is one of the underlying principles of the amateur service, the amateur service is not an emergency radio service [emphasis added].”
Here are some other peoples blogs on my video:
Just to clarify, I'm not totally against it. Just recently locally I've noticed a huge emphasis on it. In my opinion there are other ares that we should be placing a much greater emphasis on. In other words, if you enjoy dedicating yourself the the drills and so forth, fine... just try not to take it to seriously.
From what I have seen the real thing never compares to a drill. Fortunately in the area I live in the last real emergency was the Weyauwega train wreck of 1996.
While lots of local hams responded, what stands out the most is that we were not wanted by the local emergency coordinators and other officials.
So building a good relationship with these guys can't hurt. It's even better when it helps you obtain access to tower sites. But please let it stop there.
In all the house bills that recognize Amateur Radio for emergency communications it is noted that we do this "as service to the public at no cost to taxpayers."
Yet I read about FEMA grants and other federal and state taxpayer assisted money being awarded and spent on various amateur radio installations.
This is the kiss of death in my opinion. And I obviously do not condone this.